Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Blackwell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 12, 2004No. 2:04-cv-00965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiffs’ combined Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 1 seeking to allow Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo to be placed on Ohio’s general election ballot this November as candidates for President and Vice President, respectively, of the United States of America. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs’ request (Doc. # 2) is denied. In addition, the Court considers the Motion to Intervene filed by a group of Individual Electors (Doc. # 3) and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nader v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Herman Blankenship v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of State, Benson A. Wolman, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Libertarian Party v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Blankenship v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.