Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Blackwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2004No. 2004-1652PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} At issue in this case is relators’ entitlement to a writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary of State of Ohio to order boards of elections to update their voter-registration records and conduct a second review of the validity of a nominating petition seeking the placement of Ralph Nader and Miguel Camejo as independent candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States on the November 2, 2004 general election ballot in Ohio. For the following reasons, we deny the writ based on laches and relators’ failure to comply with R.C. 2731.04.

{¶ 2} Relators, Herman Blankenship, Kim…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ralph Nader v. John KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Nader v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Choices for South-Western City Schools v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Stoll v. Logan County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Finkbeiner v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API