Legal Opinion

Kanter v. Epstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2004PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 These consolidated appeals arise out of a dispute over a fee agreement. Nancy Kanter, Esquire (“Kanter”) referred a case to Alan B. Epstein, Esquire (“Epstein”). The case involved a claim by a child in the foster system who was abused by her pro*396spective adoptive foster parents (the “Tara M. case”). Kanter had served as a guardian ad litem for the child. When Kanter referred the case to Epstein, he agreed to pay her a referral fee. However, this agreement was not reduced to writing. Subsequently, Epstein joined the firm of Spector Gadon and Rosen, P.C. (“SGR”) while…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Jiricko v. Geico InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. LevanduskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API