Kanter v. Epstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
¶ 1 These consolidated appeals arise out of a dispute over a fee agreement. Nancy Kanter, Esquire (“Kanter”) referred a case to Alan B. Epstein, Esquire (“Epstein”). The case involved a claim by a child in the foster system who was abused by her pro*396spective adoptive foster parents (the “Tara M. case”). Kanter had served as a guardian ad litem for the child. When Kanter referred the case to Epstein, he agreed to pay her a referral fee. However, this agreement was not reduced to writing. Subsequently, Epstein joined the firm of Spector Gadon and Rosen, P.C. (“SGR”) while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jiricko v. Geico InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. LevanduskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.