Legal Opinion
Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 29, 1999No. Slip Op. 99-118. Court No. 98-04-00886PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
At issue in this case are various determinations made by the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”) in Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Germany: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (“Final Results”), 63 Fed.Reg. 13,217 (1998). Plaintiffs, Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG And Mannesrnann Pipe & Steel Corp. (“Man-nesmann”), through a motion for judgment on the agency record and an accompanying memorandum (collectively, “Mannesmann’s Motion”), argue…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Fujian MacHinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Shanghai Taoen Intern. Trading Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Reiner Brach GmbH & Co. KG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.