Legal Opinion

ML Direct, Inc. v. TIG Specialty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 2000No. B130852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GODOY PEREZ, J.

Plaintiffs ML Direct, Inc., and Nancy G. Shalek appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant TIG Specialty Insurance Co. in this insurance coverage declaratory relief action. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff and appellant ML Direct, Inc. (MLD), bought a directors and officers (D&O) policy (the policy) from defendant and respondent TIG Specialty Insurance Co. (TIG) for the one-year period starting March 11, 1997. The insureds under the policy were the directors and officers of MLD. The policy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Bensalem Township v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company Crum & Forster Managers Corporation, (Ill)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Barber v. Marina Sailing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. General Star Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. American Medical Security, Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Crown Capital Securities, L.P. v. Endurance American Specialty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Oates v. City of LincolnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Oak Park Calabasas Condominium Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API