Legal Opinion

Oak Park Calabasas Condominium Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 2006No. B180743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Oak Park Calabasas Condominium Association (Oak Park) appeals from an adverse judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) following a court trial in which the court determined that State Farm’s policy of insurance with Oak Park offered no potential for coverage in the underlying action, leading the court to conclude State Farm did not breach its duties to defend or to indemnify Oak Park. For the reasons hereafter stated we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SYNOPSIS

Underlying litigation with ECC.

In January of 1994 the Northridge earthquake…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. ML Direct, Inc. v. TIG Specialty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. ECC Construction, Inc. v. GansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. August Entertainment, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Verticalnet, Inc. v. U.S. Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Lakeland Village Homeowners Ass'n v. Great American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Sigma Chi Corp. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API