Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheldon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1925No. 2519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The goods imported in this case consist of small revolving cellulose fans, operated by metal push-button mechanisms. The collector classified the same for duty at 60 per centum ad valorem as fans, in chief value of cellulose, under paragraph 31, Tariff Act of 1922, which is as follows:

31. Compounds o.f pyroxylin, of other cellulose esters or ethers, or of cellulose, by whatever name known (except compounds of cellulose known as vulcanized or hard fiber), in blocks, sheets, rods, tubes, or other forms, and not made into finished or partly finished articles, 40 cents per pound; made into…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. Lun ChongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. Lee & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. KahnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Western Electric Co.United States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Freni v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Paillard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. International Fashions v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API