Legal Opinion

Paillard, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 29, 1966No. C.D. 2833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain anamorphic lenses and metal adapters which were assessed with duty as entireties at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 228(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, *440T.D. 52789 and T.D. 52820, as “projection lenses.” Plaintiff claims that the anamorphic lenses are properly dutiable at the rate of 21 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 280(d) of the said act, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John P. Herber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Unimark Photo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  4. Paillard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API