Legal Opinion
United States v. Lee & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 1, 1919No. 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 42468. [Oral argument Jan. 10,1919, by Mr. Hanson.]'
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The question here is as to the proper classification of certain woolen half hose entered at the port of Pembina, N. Dak. There were two entries.
They were assessed under that part of paragraph 288 of the tariff act of 1913, which provides for—
* * * Stockings, hose and half hose, selvedged, fashioned, narrowed, or shaped wholly or in part by knitting machines or frames, or knit by hand, including such as are commercially known as seamless stockings, hose and half hose, and clocked stockings, hose and half hose, * * * valued at more than §1.20 per dozen pairs, 40 per centum ad valorem.
The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MartorelliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- International Fashions v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- United States v. American Sponge & Chamois Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928