Legal Opinion

United States v. Lun Chong

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 16, 1912No. 953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28609 (T. D. 32560).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consisted of two importations of Chinese shoes, returned by the appraiser as leather shoes, and assessed for duty under paragraph 451 of the act of 1909. The protest claimed the goods to be dutiable under paragraph 450 as shoes of chief value of leather made from hides of cattle of the bovine species. The protest was sustained, and the basic question pre*469sented on this record is whether there was support in the record for this finding. The collector’s action being presumptively correct, has that presumption been overcome by sufficient testimony in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. TowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. Burley & Tyrrell Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API