Winzler & Kelly v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
Petitioners Winzler & Kelly, a corporation, and John Winzler, individually, seek a writ of mandate compelling respondent court to grant any or all of the following of petitioners’ motions: Motion to compel execution, acknowledgment and filing of satisfaction of judgment or for an order ordering the entry of, satisfaction of judgment without acknowledgment of satisfaction; motion to dismiss; motion for summary judgment. Alternatively petitioners seek a writ of mandate and/or prohibition commanding respondent court to desist and refrain from proceeding further with two…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.