Legal Opinion

Winzler & Kelly v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1975No. Civ. 35824PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

Petitioners Winzler & Kelly, a corporation, and John Winzler, individually, seek a writ of mandate compelling respondent court to grant any or all of the following of petitioners’ motions: Motion to compel execution, acknowledgment and filing of satisfaction of judgment or for an order ordering the entry of, satisfaction of judgment without acknowledgment of satisfaction; motion to dismiss; motion for summary judgment. Alternatively petitioners seek a writ of mandate and/or prohibition commanding respondent court to desist and refrain from proceeding further with two…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API