Legal Opinion

Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1976No. Docket 22011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, J.

Plaintiff appeals a decision of the Kalamazoo County Circuit Court which, following a bench trial, refused to impose a mechanics’ lien on a building owned by defendant Flushing Operating Corporation (Flushing). We affirm.

The building in question was leased by Flushing to Dutch Treat Bakers, Inc. (Dutch Treat). Dutch Treat desired to expand its operations by acquiring the property but could not finance the acquisition. As a result, Dutch Treat entered into negotiations with Flushing which decided to purchase the building and its plot of land and lease it to Dutch Treat. Flushing leased the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Williams & Works, Inc. v. Springfield Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API