Legal Opinion

Smalley v. Gearing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1899PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Cross-appeals from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by William Smalley and others against Joseph L. Gearing and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From the decree rendered, all of the parties except defendant Gearing appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Traugott Schmidt, now deceased, in April, 1895, was the owner of a certain lot in the city of Detroit. On April 9 th of that year, he entered into a written contract with Joseph L. Gearing for the construction of a building thereon, for the sum of $52,812.08. Afterwards, Schmidt, with the consent of Gearing, let the contract for the plastering for $6,850; thus leaving the contract to stand at $45,962.08. Gearing went on with the work under the contract, paying most of the labor bills, and in great part for the materials, when, on October 12, 1895, he failed, leaving the building uncompleted.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. John Spry Lumber Co. v. Sault Savings Bank Loan & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Warren v. SohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Reynolds v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Central Park North Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fossett v. Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API