Legal Opinion

Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1977No. 57998, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

The issue on appeal is whether a lessee acted as its lessor’s agent in contracting for certain improvements made to the leased premises. The agency theory is advanced by Plaintiff Rowen & Blair Electric Co. which, although contracting directly with the lessee to do electrical work, seeks to impress the lessor’s interest with a mechanic’s lien. The asserted agency relationship is also said to result in direct dealing by the contractor with the owner, so as to excuse the statutory requirements regarding service of the notice of intention to claim a lien, 1 and service of a copy of the recorded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. P. Delany & Co. v. DuvouNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Hart v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Denniston & Partridge Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Rowen & Blair Electric Co v. Flushing Operating CorpMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Idaho Lumber, Inc. v. BuckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Norcross Co. v. Turner-Fisher AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. AFP Specialties, Inc. v. VereykenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. J & I Service Station, Inc v. Wash Wagon of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API