Legal Opinion

McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 132, Calendar No. 35,460PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

The Ford Motor Company, a corporation, engaged in manufacturing in Fordson, in 1925 desired a grade separation at Eagle avenue — to construct an underpass 121 feet wide under the yard of the Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Railroad, the tracks of the Pere Marquette Railroad, and the land of the city of Detroit, department of street railways — to enable its employees and others to reach its plant more easily, quickly, and safely. It entered into contracts in writing with the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, the Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Railroad Company, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cook v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Heydon v. Mediaone of Southeast Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API