Brown v. Connolly
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Plaintiff Joseph A. Brown appeals from a judgment of dismissal after the sustaining of a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. A purported appeal by him from the related nonappealable order sustaining the demurrer must be dismissed. (See Lavine v. Jessup, 48 Cal.2d 611, 614 [311 P.2d 8].)
Brown is an attorney at law. His second amended complaint alleged, as material here, that: (1) he had “entered into a contract in writing with the defendants herein to act as an attorney at law for the defendants, William J. Connolly and the Sunswept Trading Co.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Moore v. FellnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Waterman v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Sterenbuch v. GossColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Trembath v. DigardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- 610 Lincoln Road, Inc. v. KELNER, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.