Legal Opinion

Brown v. Connolly

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1969No. Civ. 26209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Plaintiff Joseph A. Brown appeals from a judgment of dismissal after the sustaining of a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. A purported appeal by him from the related nonappealable order sustaining the demurrer must be dismissed. (See Lavine v. Jessup, 48 Cal.2d 611, 614 [311 P.2d 8].)

Brown is an attorney at law. His second amended complaint alleged, as material here, that: (1) he had “entered into a contract in writing with the defendants herein to act as an attorney at law for the defendants, William J. Connolly and the Sunswept Trading Co.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Moore v. FellnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Waterman v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sterenbuch v. GossColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Trembath v. DigardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. 610 Lincoln Road, Inc. v. KELNER, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API