Legal Opinion

Fracasse v. Brent

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1972No. L. A. 29876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.3d 784 (1972)

494 P.2d 9

100 Cal. Rptr. 385

GEORGE FRACASSE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

RAY RAKA BRENT, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 29876.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 10, 1972.

COUNSEL

Freeman & Freeman, Lee A. Freeman and Lawrence P. Freeman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mour, Klein & Aronson and Robert A. Klein as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Richard T. Kayaian for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BURKE, J.

In this case we are asked to reconsider the rule of damages which allows an attorney who has been discharged without cause by his client to…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. YepizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API