Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Manning

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 27, 1990No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 7, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

Philip Manning is before us for the second time charged with violation of various disciplinary rules. The first occasion involved four charges of neglect which we resolved on January 19, 1990, by imposing a sanction of indefinite suspension with the right to apply for reinstatement within 90 days.

This second Petition for Disciplinary Action also concerns four charges of neglect which the Attorney Grievance Com mission investigated. We referred this matter to the Honorable Howard S. Chasanow, then of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, (who also conducted the proceeding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PollackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FinneseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API