Attorney Grievance Commission v. Finnesey
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
On August 19, 1977 the respondent was charged by the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, with designated violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The matter was referred to a three-judge panel of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City pursuant to the provisions of Rule BV10.
The panel concluded, after an evidentiary hearing, that the misconduct had been proved only in part; it recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. The respondent filed exceptions to the panel’s determination, primarily on the ground…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PollackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.