Legal Opinion

Caheen v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 6 Div. 634PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This appeal is from the interlocutory decree entered on August 10, 1934, overruling the separate demurrers of appellants to the bill as last amended; therefore the soundness of the decree of March 30, 1934, holding the plea filed by Julien and Maurice Caheen to the original bill insufficient and striking the same, is not within the scope of this appeal.

Moreover, the statute, Code 1907, § 2838, authorizing appeals from interlocutory decrees “overruling a demurrer to a bill in equity, or sustaining or overruling a plea to such bill,” was amended by the Act approved March 17, 1915…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Carter v. Balfour's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Hinson v. NaugherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Arndt v. SandsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Cunliff v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. United States Trust Co. of NY v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API