Legal Opinion

Holder v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 8 Div. 764PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This suit was begun at law for the .recovery of land in the nature of ejectment. It was transferred to the equity side of the docket ex mero motu. Plaintiff filed a bill after such transfer, as was appropriate. Meadows v. Birmingham Federal Savings Loan Society, 232 Ala. 3, 166 So. 53.

Demurrer to the bill was overruled, from which this appeal was prosecuted. Since this is not a final decree, appellant cannot assign as error the order of transfer. An appeal is statutory, and unless the statute so authorizes, it cannot be used to review the ruling of a trial court. Pearson v.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. DeVeer v. PiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Pearson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Bowie v. MinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Village of Niles v. SzczesnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. v. Nelson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. First Nat. Bank v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API