Staples v. Barret
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The allegations of the bill of complaint show sufficiently and clearly that the deed of conveyance from the complainant Kate W. Barret to the respondent Staples was jn purpose and effect a mortgage, given as security for the debt of B. T. Barret to the respondent bank, and hence that, as against the bank, or its assigns having notice, Mrs. Barret would be entitled to a decree of cancellation. Giddens v. Powell, 108 Ala. 621, 19 So. 21; Douglass v. Moody, 80 Ala. 61; 27 Cyc. 1010, 5.
But since the assignee of the bank, L. V. Pringle, is a resident of Mississippi and beyond the jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Rosenau v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Rogers v. TorbutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Douglass v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Dixon v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Trotter v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Northcutt v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.