Legal Opinion

Arndt v. Sands

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1945No. 6 Div. 339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer to a bill in equity. The decree recites that it is sustained, because of a misjoinder of complainants, in that the bill as amended alleges that three of the complainants have no interest in the land sought to be sold for division between tenants in common.

It is ' apparent that parties are improperly joined in such a suit for that purpose, unless there is some equity in their favor which justifies it, and which is not here shown. Staples v. Barret, 214 Ala. 680, 108 So. 742, 46 A.L.R. 1084; Caheen v. First National Bank, 230…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Caheen v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaddix v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Case v. PfaffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Atkins v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API