Legal Opinion

Beverly Oil Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1953No. L. A. 21977PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an - appeal from a judgment for the defendants in an action seeking declaratory relief and to enjoin the defendants from enforcing a zoning ordinance alleged to restrict and eventually terminate the plaintiff’s nonconforming use of land for oil production.

The plaintiff owns 111/6 acres of land bounded by San Vicente, Beverly and La Cienega Boulevards and West Third Street in Los Angeles. The first producing oil well on this property was drilled in 1908 and thereafter a total of ten or eleven oil wells were placed in production. In 1924 the property was annexed to the city as a part of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API