Legal Opinion
Marciano v. Piel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 21, 1990No. 7648PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO'Connell, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of mandamus compelling the defendants, Helen Bray, the zoning enforcement officer of the town of Sherman, and William Piel, the chairman of the Sherman planning and zoning commission, to issue a zoning permit to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had sought the permit in order to construct a house on property he owned in Sherman. When his application was denied, the plaintiff filed this action seeking a mandamus. The dispositive question on appeal is whether the trial court should have proceeded to judgment in the absence of any pleadings other than a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Worden v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Par Developers, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Cloukey v. LeubaConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Bay v. Foley, No. Cv 94 0136195 (Mar. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Hesse v. Town of Vernon, No. Cv 97 64546 S (Dec. 24, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Noreika v. Jayaraj, No. Cv 99-0152514s (Dec. 10, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999