Legal Opinion

Worden v. Francis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 26, 1966PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

This appeal arises from a second trial of this case following onr decision in Worden v. Francis, 148 Conn. 459, 172 A.2d 196. The basic facts are stated in that decision. The record before us indicates that the evidence introduced by both sides in the second trial was substantially the same as the evidence offered in the first trial. Consequently, our reference to the facts here is limited to those pertinent to the assigned errors which we find to be decisive of this appeal.

In the second trial a substantial verdict was again rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Greenthal v. Lincoln, Seyms & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. Crotty v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Schiesel v. S. Z. Poli Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Corrievau v. Associated Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Asherman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API