Legal Opinion
City of Petaluma v. Hughes
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 1918No. Civ. No. 1798PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against certain defendants, arising out of certain condemnation proceedings undertaken by the city of Petaluma (a municipal corporation) for the widening and extending of a certain street within its corporate limits, the undertaking being commonly known as the “Douglass Street Extension.”
It is the contention of appellants (1) “that the charter of the city of Petaluma does not contain a valid system providing for the opening of streets, but it permits the city authorities, by ordinance, to adopt such a system; that the city of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Clouse v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cutting v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Downtown Palo Alto Committee for Fair Assessment v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Cavanagh v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Drake v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Coffey v. WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932