Legal Opinion
Drake v. Quinn
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1941No. Civ. No. 6466PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the petition for a writ of mandate after demurrer thereto had been sustained without leave to amend.
It is alleged in the petition for the writ that Curtis P. Drake was a member of the Volunteer Fire Department of the city of Eureka receiving an annual salary of $1680, payable monthly, and that on the 4th day of February 1938, the chief engineer of the fire department suspended petitioner Drake and filed proper charges against him alleging that petitioner was disqualified, -incompetent and inefficient. A hearing was had before the city…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Petaluma v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In Re Thomas and City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Coffey v. WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946