Legal Opinion
Stonum v. U.S. Airways, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 1, 1999No. C-3-98-75PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY CONDITIONALLY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #20); FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF THE DEFENDANT; THIS DECISION AND ENTRY IS NOT A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER.
WALTER HERBERT RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation stems from the Plaintiffs two-count Complaint (Doc. # 1), in which she asserts a claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. (“FMLA”), and.a state-law claim for invasion of privacy. The Plaintiff filed her Complaint after the Defendant fired her for allegedly abusing FMLA leave that she had been granted to care for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Medley v. Polk CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Sollenberger v. SollenbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rush v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Reinwald v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.