Filter Specialists, Inc. v. Brooks
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Filter Specialists, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s order affirming the decision of the Michigan City Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”), which found Filter took adverse employment action against two employees, Dawn Brooks and Charmaine Weathers (referred to collectively as the “Employees”), based on their race.1 Filter raises five issues, which we restate as: (1) whether Filter was subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction; (2) whether the Commission’s decision cannot stand based on the Employees’ failure to introduce the local ordinance…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited90 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Cedar Lake Conference Ass'n. v. Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of AppealsIndiana Tax Court · 2008
- Hamilton Southeastern Utilities, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Perry v. Indiana Department of Local Government FinanceIndiana Tax Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.