Legal Opinion
Reinwald v. Huntington National Bank
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 3, 2010No. 1:08-cv-00689PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff asserts a claim under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1) and (2). Defendant moves for summary judgment. (Doc. 22). For the reasons that follow, the Court grants defendant’s summary judgment motion.
I. Facts
Plaintiff, Kristen Reinwald, resides in Franklin County, Ohio. Defendant, The Huntington National Bank (“HNB”) is an employer within the meaning of the FMLA.
Reinwald began working for HNB as a customer service associate on May 10, 2004. Along with at least fifty other employees on her floor,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- James P. Smith v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Manzer v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Casseus v. Verizon New York, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Rush v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Harrison v. Proctor & Gamble Distrib., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Brentlinger v. Winsupply, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Goddard v. Allegiance Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021