Legal Opinion

Harris v. Egan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 21, 1948PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The defendant administrator decided that the plaintiffs, although not previously subject to the Unemployment Compensation Act, became subject to it because they acquired substantially all of the assets, organization, trade or business of another employer who at the time of such acquisition was subject to the act. The plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court under the provisions of § 1345e(f) of the 1939 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes (amended, Sup. 1947, § 1403i); the court sustained the administrator and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. In January,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. In re Temtor Corn & Fruit Products Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1924
  4. Loglisci v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Southern Photo & Blue Print Co. v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  2. New Capitol Bar & Grill Corp. v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. King v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API