Legal Opinion

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Murray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2013PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

Francis X. Murray (“Murray”), pro se, appeals the order entered on March 26, 2012. That order granted summary judgment to JP Morgan Chase Bank (“Appel-lee”) in the foreclosure action against Murray to which it allegedly succeeded as substituted plaintiff.1 The order also awarded Appellee an in rem judgment against Murray in the amount of $882,762.59, with interest of $87.77 per diem from February 1, 2012, “plus other costs and charges collectively under the [Mjortgage for foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises.” We reverse.

The original plaintiff that commenced this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Barbezat, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. U.S. Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank of America, N.A. v. PautenisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Gerber, L. v. Piergrossi, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API