JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Murray
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
Francis X. Murray (“Murray”), pro se, appeals the order entered on March 26, 2012. That order granted summary judgment to JP Morgan Chase Bank (“Appel-lee”) in the foreclosure action against Murray to which it allegedly succeeded as substituted plaintiff.1 The order also awarded Appellee an in rem judgment against Murray in the amount of $882,762.59, with interest of $87.77 per diem from February 1, 2012, “plus other costs and charges collectively under the [Mjortgage for foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises.” We reverse.
The original plaintiff that commenced this…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Barbezat, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- U.S. Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank of America, N.A. v. PautenisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Gerber, L. v. Piergrossi, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.