Legal Opinion

PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 2014No. 1899 WDA 2013PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellants, Richard H. Powell and Rachel M. Powell (together, the “Powells”), appeal pro se from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee, PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”), in this in rem mortgage foreclosure action. The Powells contend that they never signed a mortgage note, but if they did sign it, PHH does not have the right to enforce it. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s order in favor of PHH.

On January 12, 2010, PHH filed a mortgage foreclosure action against the Pow-ells. PHH alleged that on September 28, 2007, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. MarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. WMI Group, Inc. v. Fox, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Americhoice Fed. Credit Union v. Ross, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Fell, R. v. 340 Associates, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API