Legal Opinion
Baize v. Eastridge Companies, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 2006No. B185823, B188433PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In these consolidated proceedings, the parties to a wrongful termination action agreed to submit their dispute to binding arbitration, pursuant to an agreement by which the arbitrator was required to apply California law. The arbitrator issued an award in favor of the former employee, who then petitioned to confirm the award. The employer opposed, and moved to vacate the award, on the basis that the arbitrator had failed to correctly apply California law. The trial court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review the arbitrator’s award for errors of law, and entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- NEC Electronics Inc. v. HurtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Turman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.