Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Clark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1893No. 760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.

The appellee sued appellant to recover damages resulting from a fire started by appellant in grass and weeds negligently permitted to accumulate upon its right of way, which was by appellant negli*156gently permitted to escape to appellee’s land, all occurring without any contributory negligence upon the part of appellee.

It is urged that the complaint is bad for want of averments that the fire was caused by some negligent act or defective machinery of appellant. Such averments are unnecessary.

If appellants set fire to the dry grass and other combustible materials which it had negligently suffered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. OvermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. KaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indiana Horseshoe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Masoner v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Payne v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API