Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Hart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1889No. 12,927PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

This is an action brought by the appellees against the appellant, whereby they seek to recover damages for the loss of a certain lot of hay which they allege was burned and destroyed because of the appellant’s negligence.

The complaint is in one paragraph. The appellant first filed a demurrer thereto, alleging want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which was overruled by the court; to which ruling it excepted, and then filed aD answer *275in general denial. The issue joined was submitted to a jury, who returned a special verdict; after the return of the verdict…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Citizens Bank v. BolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indiana Horseshoe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API