Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Overman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
The first error, of which appellant here complains, is the overruling of its demurrer to appellee’s complaint. The complaint contained four paragraphs, to each of which appellant demurred upon several grounds of objection ; but, in this court, the only objection urged to either paragraph of complaint is, that it does not state facts suffi- ■ cient to constitute a cause of action. In their brief of this -cause, appellant’s counsel concede that substantially the same facts are stated in each of the first three paragraphs of complaint; and, therefore, we need only to consider and pass *539upon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Mortimore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
- Landes v. WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indiana Horseshoe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.