Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Kane
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
This action was brought by the appellees to recover for services rendered the appellant as attorneys. There is no bill of exceptions containing the evidence, and many of the questions discussed by appellant’s counsel are not presented by the record. There is in the record a paper purporting to be the stenographer’s report of the evidence, but it is not signed or attested by the judge, and is, therefore, entirely without force. The judge recites, in a separate paper, that special bills of exceptions and a general one were presented to him, and that he signs them, but the general bill is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Tucker v. ConradIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Stone v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Colt v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Inland Steel Co. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- City of Lawton v. McAdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Harris v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.