Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Wheeler Construction Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1963No. 272PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

The defendant (appellee) built a home for plaintiffs (appellants) under a cost-plus contract. Plaintiffs brought this ac tion for damages in excess of $29,000 based on a theory of fraud. Defendant counterclaimed for $14,284.99 — the difference between the total cost as billed by defendant ($42,633.84) and the amount that plaintiffs had paid on account ($28,348.85).

The trial judge determined that the allegation of fraud was not supported by the evidence, but found that there was a partial failure of performance on defendant’s part and adjusted the amount of the counterclaim…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. DeArmond v. Alaska State Development CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Gonsalves v. HodgsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Veal v. Newlin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Vogt v. WinbauerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ahlstrom v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Meyst v. East Fifth Avenue Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API