Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Winbauer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1962No. 305PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellee, Violet Winbauer, moves to strike the notice of appeal in this case for the reason that it was not timely filed and to dismiss the appeal because the requirement as to timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional.

Notations in the civil docket of the superior court reveal that this action was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. Trial by jury was held on August 30 and 31, 1962, and a verdict returned in favor of the appellee on the latter date. Also under date of August 31 appears the docket notation:

“Enter Judgment on Jury Verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edward T. Hulson and Walter A. Christensen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. Bridges v. Alaska Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Edwards v. FrankeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Holton v. HoltonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Schaefer v. DuhameArizona Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Miller v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Thomson v. Wheeler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. McCoy v. Alaska Brick Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McCarrey v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API