Legal Opinion

Veal v. Newlin, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1961No. 80PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Veal fell on a stairway in a store owned by the Newlin corporations. There was a handrail on one side only. Asserting that Newlin was negligent in not having a handrail on the other side of the stairs, and that this was the cause of his fall, Veal commenced this action for damages because of injuries he allegedly sustained. The jury found against him, his motion for a new trial was denied, and he has appealed.

The trial court instructed the jury that the absence of the handrail was negligence on Newlin’s part because this was in violation of a municipal ordinance. However, it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Davidsen v. KirklandAlaska Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API