Legal Opinion

Ahlstrom v. Cummings

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1964No. 330PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellants brought this action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. A jury found for the appellees. Appellants contend that errors were committed in the court below which require that the case be remanded for a new trial.

Appellants’ main point is that the jury’s verdict was contrary to law and the weight of the evidence, and therefore the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial.

The matter of granting or refusing a new trial rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. We shall not interfere with the exercise of his discretion except in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Veal v. Newlin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Thomson v. Wheeler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rank v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Miller v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1958

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API