Legal Opinion
DeArmond v. Alaska State Development Corporation
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1962No. 285PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
The constitutionality of certain functions proposed to be performed by the Alaska State Development Corporation is questioned in this appeal. Before discussing the legal questions raised we shall outline generally the purpose, powers and duties of the corporation.
The corporation came into being through an act of the state legislature. 1 It has for its purpose the creation of “an instrumentality of the state to develop, stimulate, and advance the business prosperity and economic welfare of Alaska and its citizens”. These objectives according to the act are to “be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Veal v. Newlin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Wilmington Parking Authority v. RankenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. v. Juab CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- University of Alaska v. National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.