Frasch v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in defendant’s favor when the plaintiff refused to amend upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the first amended complaint.
The action is one for declaratory relief. Plaintiff is seeking to have it determined that the defendant com- , pany is bound by and liable under the terms and conditions of a certain policy of fire insurance alleged to have been issued by it. It appears from the complaint that the person who solicited the insurance and delivered the policy, collected and receipted for the premium and absconded with the money, whereupon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aalwyn v. CobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Arthurholt v. Susquehanna Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- City of Alturas v. GlosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sunset Scavenger Corp. v. OddouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.