Legal Opinion

Carson v. McDowell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1969No. 45,210 and 45,292PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This is an appeal from the judgments in two consolidated cases (Nos. 45,210 and 45,292) in which the district court approved two ordinances changing zoning in the city of Kansas City, Kansas.

As the cases are to be decided on the procedural sufficiency to vest the city with jurisdiction to make the zoning change in each case the general facts may be abbreviated.

On December 14, 1965, the city annexed most of the territory east of the eastern boundary of the Canterbury additions. The annexed territory automatically assumed a single family…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carp v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Ford v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Armourdale State Bank v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. City of Wichita v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. McQueary v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Paul v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API