Paul v. City of Manhattan
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Foth, C.:
This case involves a challenge to the validity of an ordinance of the City of Manhattan rezoning “Cedar Crest,” a 54-lot subdivision, from “R” single-family residential to “R-2” two-family residential. Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Warren I. Paul, are neighboring landowners and residents. They brought this action on behalf of themselves and other neighbors attacking both the procedure leading to the rezoning ordinance and its reasonableness. The ordinance was upheld by the trial court and plaintiffs have appealed.
The rezoning was requested by the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilcox v. BillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Moyer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Bodine v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Arkenberg v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. DeaversSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Golden v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. CostaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.