Legal Opinion

In the Interest of G. M.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1980No. B-8515PublishedCited by 730 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This case involves the involuntary termination of a parent-child relationship. The trial court applied the preponderance of the evidence standard to its findings and terminated the relationship. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. 580 S.W.2d 65. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.

The question here is whether the facts in an involuntary parent-child termination proceeding must be proved by the preponderance of the evidence or the clear and convincing evidence standard. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by730 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003

725 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API