Gang v. Gang
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Although this proceeding to compel the appellant to refund money received by him from his client is entitled in the action, it is in fact a special proceeding, and the order made at Special Term was a final order, and the order of the Appellate Division modifying that order is appealable to this court as a matter of right. It does not appear from the order of the Appellate Division that the modification was upon a question of fact. In the absence of such a provision in the order of the Appellate Division, this court will assume that the modification was upon an error of law. We apply to final…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of FlaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re Proving the Will of ShontsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Goodman v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Schnibbe v. GlenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Braunworth v. BraunworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. GriesenbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Reynolds v. Eagle Pencil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- In re PackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.