Legal Opinion

In re Pack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion to compel respondent, an attorney, to pay over certain funds affirmed, but without costs, the respondent having failed to appear or to file a brief. Neither party requested a hearing and each was satisfied to have the matter determined on affidavits. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., with whom Tompkins, J., concurs, dissents, with the following memorandum: The affidavits do not disclose whether a hearing was or was not demanded. The appellant says that he should have had a hearing. The respondent does not assert that a hearing was not demanded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. H. & J. Guttag Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Matter of SperanzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Gang v. GangNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. In re ErnstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API